|
Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| March, 2009 (2) |
| October, 2008 (1) |
| June, 2008 (1) |
| March, 2008 (1) |
| January, 2008 (1) |
| December, 2007 (1) |
| September, 2007 (2) |
| August, 2007 (0) |
| June, 2007 (2) |
| May, 2007 (3) |
| April, 2007 (2) |
| March, 2007 (3) |
| February, 2007 (1) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Technical Support Central
|
 Monday, March 12, 2007
Historical Pigments
Binding Media for Historical Pigments  I recently returned from the 2007 College Art Association meeting in New York where I, with 3 other participants, gave a talk on historical pigments. My presentation, “The Use of Traditional Pigments in Conjunction with Contemporary Binding Media and Techniques,” was part of the session called “The Contemporary Relevance of the Renaissance Palette.” The title I gave to the chair of the talks changed focus a bit over the course of my research. By the time I’d completed my study for the presentation, the emphasis had shifted to the physical structure and spectral composition of historical colorants. It was difficult to isolate artists who use historical pigments with contemporary binders to take advantage of the physical characteristics of the materials. I found that the working properties of the pigments stimulated my curiosity more than using historical pigments to formulate paint. Today I want to focus on one aspect that I didn't fully develop at the College Art Association session. What are appropriate binding mediums for historical pigments? It seems that no hard and fast rules apply to what pigments can be mixed with aqueous mediums such as watercolor gums, starches and acrylic binders. Many pigments, because they are toxic or reactive with each other, will not be selected for aqueous mixtures. A pigment like Orpiment degrades in water and does not benefit the artist when used in aqueous media. Besides, it smells like rotten eggs as well. Some pigments are just hard to mate with water-based binders, so any paint made would not perform well. Examine the list of pigments used by acrylic paint manufacturers and compare that list with an oil color line of paints. The differences will reveal what pigments have a difficult time mixing with water-based mediums. (Note: Don't compare the color names. The pigment names are the important factor when making a comparison.) However, an artist can exploit some of these incompatibilities. Unless a pigment mixed with water media will break down, the unusual reaction may possess unusual characteristics that have visual appeal. Again, unless some harmful or rapid deterioration is created by the presence of water, an artist is free to explore the possibilities inherent in historical pigments. Do you have any unusual pigment/binder combinations that create interesting results? Please share them. Additional notesA brief clarification of terms: Rutherford J. Gettens and George L. Stout, who co-authored Painting Materials: A Short Encyclopaedia (1942) defined “pigment” as “a finely divided coloring material which is suspended in discrete particles in the vehicle in which it is used as a paint (thus being opposed to a dye which is soluble in the vehicle). Pigments are derived from a wide variety of substances, organic and inorganic, natural and artificial. They may be classified according to color, chemical composition or source.” To read more, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigment.Orpiment is arsenic trisulphide; King’s Yellow is the name of the pigment if it’s artificially made. Orpiment was made by grinding the native mineral orpiment into a powder. It's a very bright yellow; it works well in oil. The artificially made pigment is very poisonous, but the native orpiment was evidently not so. Orpiment, found in the art of the most ancient civilizations, has been replaced, in modern times, by the cadmium yellows. To read more about Orpiment, sometimes called Chinese Yellow, including where it is found and how it is processed, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orpiment and http://webexhibits.org/pigments/indiv/overview/orpiment.html.
3/12/2007 10:08:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 07, 2007
What’s in a Name? Paint pigments and their stories
 When it comes to the names of pigments, I find that the more unusual the name, the better the story. I search for these odd names and relish them like a gem collector who finds a precious stone. Names like Ackerman’s Yellow, Field’s Carmine and Davy’s Grey come to mind. What are the origins of these unusual pigment names? Who manufactured these pigments? What artists purchased them and what pictures contain them? Pigments tell a backhanded story about their inventors, region of origin, manufacturers’ dreams, and a marketer’s hope. I’m particularly attracted to pigment names that are incorporated with the inventor’s name, such as Leithner’s Blue. Was it hard work, shrewd advertising, pride—or vanity—that drove the inventor to incorporating a family name into the colorant? It seems that often the invention of a process is the influencing factor in naming a pigment. Take lead white, as an example. This pigment exists as a colorant in documents dating from the 1st century BC. Lead white has a fascinating history of manufacture as well as use. It spans the breadth of both the industrial and artistic world. While today it’s used nearly exclusively as an artist’s pigment, in the past it was ubiquitous for all manner of color and coating. If we look at it from the perspective of the past, we see a material that’s dense and opaque, mixes well with oil, has protective properties, and is perfect for tinting with other colorants or application by itself. Many of the aliases for lead white indicate the city or region where it was manufactured. Cremnitz White, derived from the name of the Austria town (Krems), where the process was developed to produce the pigment, was probably the most popular. Berlin White, Dutch White, French White, Hamburg White, Nottingham White, London White and Vienna White indicate that Krems, Austria, did not have a lock on the production of lead pigment. New processes of taking dull metallic lead, combining it with acetic acid and finishing it with carbonic acid to create lead carbonate were engineered in a variety of fascinating ways. Most of us who have a passing interest in pigments know the story of taking lead sheets (or buckle-shaped masses of lead) and exposing them to vinegar in a closed container that’s surrounded by manure. There were many variations on this practice, in the attempt to create the best method of transforming elemental lead into lead carbonate. Most processes, however, were incomplete. The goal therefore was to adjust the manufacturing process in order to convert the highest percentage of lead to lead carbonate. The lead white pigments that attract my attention are the ones with unusual names like Bartlett Lead, Freeman’s non-poisonous lead white, and Condy’s White Lead. To uncover the secrets of these paints’ origins requires a fair bit of investigation. Some of these lead whites may have made a fortune for their manufacturers, while others barely allowed their makers to scrape out a meager yearly profit. However, one thing is certain. None of them is being manufactured or in common use today. The lead white industry services a few specialty plastics and the art materials industry. Lead paints’ most notable use was as a coating for bridges. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco was originally painted with a red lead primer and a lead topcoat. New York’s bridges spanning the boroughs were all painted with lead based paints. Today, zinc primers with epoxy, urethane or latex final coats have taken the place of the traditional lead coatings. Lead paints will never have the status or use they once secured. We’re all far better off for it! Nonetheless, they still are among the first choices for many artists, who would find it hard to paint without lead white and shudder to think that someday it may disappear. What do you think about the continued use of lead paint for artists? In addition: As a metal, lead is soft, malleable, ductile, easily fusible, dense and dull medium-gray in color. It is used in containers for corrosives or radioactive materials; it is no longer a component in pencils and most gasolines. The ancient Chinese, the Etruscans and the Roman added lead to bronze when they cast sculptures. Lead carbonate is a poisonous white amorphous powder, PbCO3, used as a paint pigment. To read more about lead paint or to find answers to questions on other art materials, search The Artist’s Magazine’s Technical Q&A site at www.artistsmagazine.com/tam_qna.asp. The great and tormented Spanish painter Francisco Goya (http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/goya/) may have suffered from lead poisoning, according to Janis Tomlinson, the author of a prize-winning biography, Francisco Goya y Lucientes (Phaidon, 1994, 1999). To read a doctor’s conflicting diagnosis of what ailed Goya, visit www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/
query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10541154&dopt=Abstract
To read commentary on a few of Goya’s last, “Black Paintings” which he painted on the walls of his home, go to dametzdesign.com/goya.html. Other artists posthumously diagnosed with lead toxicity are Vincent van Gogh (Dutch, 1853-90) www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/gogh/) and the Candido Portinari (Brazilian, 1903-62) ( www.artcyclopedia.com/artists/portinari_candido.html). Krems, Austria, where Cremnitz White originated, is today a locus for cutting-edge art. Danube University's Department for Applied Cultural Studies offers a master of arts degree in MediaArtHistories, a two-year, low-residency program that “provides students with deeper understanding of the most important developments of contemporary art: the latest, most controversial software, interface developments, computer animation, net art, interactive, telematic and genetic art, as well as the most recent reflections on bio and nano art, CAVE installations, augmented reality and locative media.” To learn more, visit www.turbulence.org/blog/archives/002145.html
3/7/2007 11:42:07 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, February 05, 2007
Welcome and beware of myths
Welcome to my weblog, an opportunity for me to extend beyond the confines of the “Ask the Experts” column in The Artist’s Magazine. I plan to discuss, in a casual but informative way, topics that interest and concern you, such as art materials, techniques and the history of art materials.
By way of introduction, I’m responsible for a large collection of art materials in a major American museum. My responsibility in managing this collection is to provide future generations of scientists and conservators pristine samples and accompanying trade literature that will help reveal the chemical and working properties of art materials in use today. My association with this work sparked an interest in researching the history of pigments, the function of both common and rare art materials, and the unsung history of people who have made a contribution to and have had an impact on the art materials world. These people aren’t household names. They’ve been relegated to a footnote in history, but their presence is still felt and with us in unusual ways.
I’m always amazed by the extent to which artists will go to root out information about how artists in the past used materials. Sometimes these contemporary artists mistranslate or misinterpret the information in ways that are both comic and sad. We could fill a book with the myths concerning artists' techniques! Each generation picks up what it believes are the standard textbooks and educates itself on the inaccurate knowledge published by the experts of that day. These experts may have meant well, but were restricted by the technical research capacity of the time and by the lack of scientific support by a body of experts in the field. When I first encountered some of the sources of these fabrications, I got quite annoyed that myths kept creeping into the working vocabulary of artists. Now I just think of it as job security!
Today, we have conservation scientists and conservators throughout the globe studying art materials and techniques. This corpus of knowledge has slowly revealed both common and startling discoveries, and I look forward to sharing them with you.
2/5/2007 11:08:08 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
|