Monday, March 12, 2007
Historical Pigments
Binding Media for Historical Pigments

I recently returned from the 2007 College Art Association meeting in New York where I, with 3 other participants, gave a talk on historical pigments. My presentation, “The Use of Traditional Pigments in Conjunction with Contemporary Binding Media and Techniques,” was part of the session called “The Contemporary Relevance of the Renaissance Palette.”  The title I gave to the chair of the talks changed focus a bit over the course of my research. By the time I’d completed my study for the presentation, the emphasis had shifted to the physical structure and spectral composition of historical colorants. It was difficult to isolate artists who use historical pigments with contemporary binders to take advantage of the physical characteristics of the materials. I found that the working properties of the pigments stimulated my curiosity more than using historical pigments to formulate paint.

Today I want to focus on one aspect that I didn't fully develop at the College Art Association session. What are appropriate binding mediums for historical pigments? 

It seems that no hard and fast rules apply to what pigments can be mixed with aqueous mediums such as watercolor gums, starches and acrylic binders. Many pigments, because they are toxic or reactive with each other, will not be selected for aqueous mixtures. A pigment like Orpiment degrades in water and does not benefit the artist when used in aqueous media. Besides, it smells like rotten eggs as well. Some pigments are just hard to mate with water-based binders, so any paint made would not perform well. Examine the list of pigments used by acrylic paint manufacturers and compare that list with an oil color line of paints. The differences will reveal what pigments have a difficult time mixing with water-based mediums. (Note: Don't compare the color names. The pigment names are the important factor when making a comparison.)

However, an artist can exploit some of these incompatibilities. Unless a pigment mixed with water media will break down, the unusual reaction may possess unusual characteristics that have visual appeal. Again, unless some harmful or rapid deterioration is created by the presence of water, an artist is free to explore the possibilities inherent in historical pigments. Do you have any unusual pigment/binder combinations that create interesting results? Please share them.

Additional notes
A brief clarification of terms:  Rutherford J. Gettens and George L. Stout, who co-authored Painting Materials: A Short Encyclopaedia (1942) defined “pigment” as “a finely divided coloring material which is suspended in discrete particles in the vehicle in which it is used as a paint (thus being opposed to a dye which is soluble in the vehicle). Pigments are derived from a wide variety of substances, organic and inorganic, natural and artificial.  They may be classified according to color, chemical composition or source.” To read more, go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigment.

Orpiment is arsenic trisulphide; King’s Yellow is the name of the pigment if it’s artificially made.  Orpiment was made by grinding the native mineral orpiment into a powder. It's a very bright yellow; it works well in oil. The artificially made pigment is very poisonous, but the native orpiment was evidently not so. Orpiment, found in the art of the most ancient civilizations, has been replaced, in modern times, by the cadmium yellows. To read more about Orpiment, sometimes called Chinese Yellow, including where it is found and how it is processed, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orpiment
and http://webexhibits.org/pigments/indiv/overview/orpiment.html.




3/12/2007 10:08:18 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [3] 
8/31/2007 12:29:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Michael, One aspect of historical pigments that you did not touch in this column is particle size. You have heard me discuss this in prior communications, but the generally larger particle size found in historical pigments allows the artist to exploit some important aspects of painting:

1. Paint is more transparent with larger particles than with smaller ones, even given the same pigment composition.

2. Larger and heterogeneous particles usually give the paint a different body or feel, such as long and ropey as opposed to the predominately short, buttery paint found in most tubes today.

3. Variation in particle size from large to small was exploited by past masters to create textural effects in their work. This can be seen, for example, in many of Diego Velázquez paintings, especially in his later work.

Rather than historical pigments being a mere curiosity for painters who are historical buffs, they provide opportunities to explore qualities in paint other than simply color. This exploration may even be done with modern pigments that are specially made by “pigment boutiques.” We will see more of these types of pigments being specially created for artists’ use in the upcoming years.
12/7/2007 10:08:10 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I didn't knew that Orpiment was made by grinding the native mineral orpiment into a powder but it sure is interesting to find out about new things.
3/6/2008 12:54:33 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I would like to note that the pigments that are only used in oil, but not in acrylics, are alkaline sensitive and that is why they are not compatible with acrylics. They are all used in watercolor paints, for example. It does not have anything to do with the water, but the alkaline nature of the acrylic dispersion. You can mix the alkaline sensitive pigments, PV16, PG18, PB27, PV14, etc. with acrylic dispersion and use it immediately, as the dried acrylic film is no longer alkaline. However, it is in the long term storage that commercial acrylic paints must withstand that the alkaline acrylics dispersion will have negative reactions with the alkaline sensitive pigments.

Also, in regards to George's comment, only some pigments are made more transparent by larger particle sizes. Generally, smaller particle sizes create more transparent pigments, along with the refractive index of the pigment. The transparent versions of the Pyrrole reds, for instance, have much smaller pigment particle sizes than their opaque versions. Also, the pthalocayanine pigments and dioxazine violet have very small particle sizes and are extremely transparent. There are many versions of PY83, and the most opaque versions have the largest particle sizes. Even a historic burnt sienna pigment I have from italy is dull an opaque when simply mixed with oil, but when ground heavily with the glass muller and particle sizes and agglomerates are reduced the pigment becomes intensely transparent.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):